BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Concepción-Zavaleta MJ, Fuentes-Mendoza JM, López-Ramírez EP, Martínez-García JA, Concepción-Urteaga LA, Paz-Ibarra J. Endocrine disorders linked to chronic kidney disease: Mechanisms and clinical implications. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(1): 113875 [PMID: 41884239 DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i1.113875]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Dear Editorial Team, Thank you very much for publishing our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate the time and effort invested by the editorial team and the reviewers throughout the evaluation process. The peer review process was rigorous, constructive, and fair, and the feedback we received was extremely valuable in improving the quality and clarity of our work. We are grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the journal and to share our research with the scientific community. It has been a very positive experience working with your journal. We hope to continue collaborating and publishing with the journal in the future. Best regards, Professor Marcio Concepción-Zavaleta Endocrinology and Metabolism Universidad Científica del Sur Lima, Peru
Reply from the Editorial Office
Thanks for taking the time to share this feedback with us. We would love to work with you again!